Below-Average Risk (35–42%)
Industry occupation-mix grade — shared by every Services-Misc Health & Allied Services, NEC employer tracked
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Workforce AI-exposure profile for Fresenius Medical Care AG: industry grade B (39.2/100), plus SEC headcount and BLS occupation mix.
Weighted average O*NET AI exposure score for this industry's occupation mix
Fresenius Medical Care AG's workforce carries a grade B AI-risk profile (39.2% weighted exposure), 2.7 points below the 41.9% average across 1,965 tracked employers. That is broadly typical of the industries tracked here; it describes the industry, not this company's own staffing.
Where Fresenius Medical Care AG sits among tracked employers
Industry occupation-mix AI exposure across the 1,965 public employers tracked. The marker is Services-Misc Health & Allied Services, NEC's value, which every employer we track in that sector shares — it is not a measurement of Fresenius Medical Care AG specifically.
Where Fresenius Medical Care AG's industry AI exposure sits
Industry occupation-mix AI exposure across tracked public employers
39.2% Lower than most lower than 58% of 1,965 employers
Employers, banded by industry AI-exposure mix
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more employers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source O*NET / PlainWorkforce employer industry mix · 2026-05-15
AI Displacement Risk Analysis
Companies in Services-Misc Health & Allied Services, NEC sit below the typical industry AI-exposure band. Most roles still need dexterity, interpersonal skill, or on-site presence that current AI systems struggle with.
Industry exposure standing
Signature: 39.2/100 (grade B) · industry AI-exposure score (corpus extremity among disclosed peers)
As of May 2026, Fresenius Medical Care AG sits near the middle on both disclosed headcount and three-year change. Industry grade B (39.2/100) is shared by every tracked employer in Services-Misc Health & Allied Services, NEC. As of May 2026, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has no XBRL headcount on file. Industry grade B (39.2/100) from Services-Misc Health & Allied Services, NEC is the primary measurable signal here.
SIC 8090 · NAICS 62 · 6 estimated roles; largest share Ophthalmologists, except pediatric · sources SEC EDGAR · O*NET 30.0 · BLS industry-occupation distributions.
Estimated Workforce Occupation Mix (Industry Average)
Fresenius Medical Care AG does not publish its own occupation breakdown, so this reflects the typical occupation mix for other employers in Services-Misc Health & Allied Services, NEC (BLS industry-occupation employment distributions), not company-specific data. AI exposure scores from O*NET Database 30.0.
| Occupation | Est. Workforce Share | AI Exposure |
|---|---|---|
| Ophthalmologists, except pediatric SOC 29-1241 | | |
| Psychiatric aides SOC 31-1133 | | |
| Shipping, receiving, and inventory clerks SOC 43-5071 | | |
| Counselors, all other SOC 21-1019 | | |
| Funeral home managers SOC 11-9171 | | |
| Gambling service workers, all other SOC 39-3019 | | |
Methodology and scoring detail live on our how we score AI exposure page; occupation hubs sit under Browse all occupations.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the AI risk grade for Fresenius Medical Care AG's industry?
Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) maps to Services-Misc Health & Allied Services, NEC with a mid-pack industry AI grade B (39.2/100). That score is identical for every tracked employer in the sector. Companies in Services-Misc Health & Allied Services, NEC sit below the typical industry AI-exposure band. Most roles still need dexterity, interpersonal skill, or on-site presence that current AI systems struggle with.
How is the AI risk score calculated?
The score uses the company's primary industry (SIC 8090: Services-Misc Health & Allied Services, NEC), mapped to BLS occupational employment shares. Each occupation gets an O*NET task-level AI exposure weight; the industry mix is the weighted average. 0 = no exposure; 100 = maximum.
Which occupations at Fresenius Medical Care AG face the most AI risk?
Largest estimated shares in the Services-Misc Health & Allied Services, NEC mix: Ophthalmologists, except pediatric (28% AI exposure); Psychiatric aides (36% AI exposure); Shipping, receiving, and inventory clerks (60% AI exposure). Treat these as industry-typical roles, not Fresenius Medical Care AG's published org chart.
How many employees does Fresenius Medical Care AG have?
Fresenius Medical Care AG does not disclose employee count in recent XBRL filings. Check the latest 10-K or annual report for a current figure.
Has Fresenius Medical Care AG had layoffs?
WARN Act layoff notices for Fresenius Medical Care AG are published by state labor agencies and the U.S. Department of Labor when a covered mass layoff hits the 100-worker threshold. Many quieter workforce changes never appear in WARN.
What industry is Fresenius Medical Care AG in?
Fresenius Medical Care AG is classified under SIC 8090 (Services-Misc Health & Allied Services, NEC), mapping to NAICS sector 62. That classification selects the BLS occupation mix behind the AI exposure grade.
What to do with this
Use Fresenius Medical Care AG's risk profile above to plan next steps, not just react to the grade.
- Compare this employer against another company on AI risk, headcount, and trend using the interactive tool. Workforce comparison tool
- See exactly how the AI risk score above is calculated from occupation-level exposure data. Reading AI exposure scores
- See how every tracked employer ranks nationwide by AI displacement risk. Employer AI risk rankings
AI risk scores are estimates based on industry-level occupation distributions and may not reflect individual employer hiring practices; this is not financial advice.
AI risk scores are estimates based on industry-level occupation distributions and may not reflect individual employer hiring practices. Data sources: SEC EDGAR (company SIC codes) · O*NET Database 30.0 (AI exposure scores) · BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034. This is not financial advice.